WHY
REVISION IS LIBERATING
It
should go without saying but I think I’ll say it anyway. Revision is more
important than drafting. Nothing wrong with NANO or any other method or
deadline that helps the writer push through a first draft. My own process is to
write a first draft as quickly as possible. Just get it done. Just finish. But
here’s the thing—I push through knowing it’s going to be, well, basically,
crap. 99.999999999999999999999999999999% of the time it is crap for me and most
writers. (That’s a percentage arrived at after careful mathematical evaluation
of absolutely no data—in case you were wondering.)
I’ve
heard agents call December the cruelest month because people who do NANO finish
their novels and send their masterpieces into agents. And naturally they are
bad, no terrible, and agents get hundreds of ridiculously bad manuscripts
because novice writers have written a draft of a novel and think they’re done.
NO.
It just doesn't work that way for 99.99999999999999999999999% (or thereabouts) of
us.
A
first draft is just the beginning.
In a way, that’s liberating. You don’t have to get it right. You won’t
get it right. You know this. You allow yourself to write on through the fog,
the forest, the wasteland—whatever you want to call it. You accept there will
be wrong turns and missteps and that acceptance helps you push through the very
humbling experience of writing a first draft.
Revision,
really re-seeing the novel in the first few revisions, and then revising
language and re-seeing again and going through for particular problems and
tightening characters and doing whatever you need to do over the next five or
six versions of the novel—or however many it takes—is what shapes that rough
draft into something that isn’t rough.
That’s
how, in my humble opinion, a novel comes into being. It’s built and rebuilt and
rebuilt.
No comments:
Post a Comment