So
here’s my problem. I can’t be faithful. I’m not monogamous. When it comes to
fiction, I just can’t do it. It would be simpler if I could be. But both as a
reader and a writer, I’m drawn to many different genres: literary, fantasy,
realism, mystery, sci-fi. To make matters worse I like serious novels that also
have some kind of humor in them. I’m most excited by fiction that blends many
of these genres and elements.
I’m a
mess.
I was
on a panel at a writing conference recently and one of my fellow-panelists said
that the problem with genre bending/blending was expectation. An editor on the
panel agreed. His point: The audience has certain expectations for a genre and
if those expectations aren’t met they’re not going to like the novel.
The
panelist said that it was like going to a soft-drink machine and pressing Coke
and getting a Dr. Pepper. I absolutely see how that would be disappointing,
even maddening. I don’t care for Dr. Pepper. Sorry DP fans.
And I
do get what he means about expectation, but many of the writers I love have
convinced readers to know them well enough to know that their fiction won’t fit
neatly into a genre label. A few examples would be Neil Gaiman, Kelly Link,
Kurt Vonnegut, Stephen King, Chris Moore—or they wander into new territory and
later everyone says they’re writing in a new genre-- like Gabriel Garcia
Marquez and magical realism.
I
like realism as a writer and a reader. I’m a fan of John Green and Pete Hautman
(who writes in many genres) and Rainbow Rowell and Francisco Stork—to name a
few. But I also like fantasy—The Golden Compass, Elsewhere, Harry Potter, and many,
many others.
These
two genres, when done well, really get me excited as a reader.
They
also excite me as a writer but I don’t want to have to choose. I don’t want to
write one or the other. I want to write realism and I want to write fantasy.
Both at the same time. I’m telling people I write fantastical realism (which
I’m pretty sure isn’t a real literary term but if I say it with confidence
maybe I won’t get called on it) to try to describe what I do in Utopia, Iowa—my
novel coming out early next year. There are magical creatures in that novel and
people who have gifts that are magical. But the day to day of the novel has
many ordinary moments. My main character has pretty normal teenager problems:
girl problems, school problems, parent problems. He has a dream of becoming a
writer for movies and it both scares and exhilarates him. He also happens to
see ghosts.
This
is what excites me as a writer. This mix.
To
make matters worse and add yet another element: I like to write characters who
find humor in our sad, strange, funny world. So that’s another thing that
excites me when I write fiction. Writing with a sense of humor about the
strange and sometimes serious aspects of our world. There are many writers who
have this particular problem: Gaiman, Prachett, Green and, of course, Mr.
Dickens and Ms. Austen. Many more. I love reading fiction that has this element,
which, I suppose, is one of the reasons I love writing it.
Maybe
all I’m saying in all this is that as both a writer and a reader the books that
most excite me are the ones that surprise me in some way.
I
think you have to write what excites you. Anything less—even if it will be
easier to sell because it fits more neatly into a category—will be less. The
reader will notice. And, more importantly, you won’t have nearly as much fun.